Please Email me off-list so we can discuss this further. Thanks Chad !! My
address is
ontheluce@adelphia.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chad Evans" <hemidak@msn.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Now MOPAR PCM FOR SALE/ was Re: DML: Mopar PCM question
>
> I have a mopar pcm for sale for a 99 5.2L 2wd $200 + shipping
>
>>From: B1LLYW@aol.com
>>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>>To: aol@dakota-truck.net
>>Subject: Re: DML: Mopar PCM question
>>Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:10:00 EST
>>
>>In a message dated 12/23/2004 4:35:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>>ontheluce@adelphia.net writes:
>>
>>
>> > HI. I am curious about something. What performance differences would
>>there
>> >
>> > be between using the Mopar permance PCM vs. using the Jet Performance
>> > "module" (which I currently use) ?? Don't they use a different means
>>of
>> > accomplishing the same thing ?? Also, would anyone know if a '98
>> > performance PCM is the same thing as one for a '99, all other things
>>being
>> > equal (equipment wise) ??? Thanks for your advise in advance, and I am
>> > looking forward to hearing the different opinions on this issue. Merry
>> > CHRISTmas !!!
>> >
>>
>>The Mopar pcm changes the base programming to improve performance. The
>>Jet
>>chip is supposed to modify the programming. What happens with the Jet is
>>the
>>pcm adapts to what it is doing and the gains are minimal if at all. The
>>Mopar
>>pcm, by changing the base programming, doesn't "lose" it's gains. They
>>are
>>always there.
>>
>>Bill White - KRC Performance
>>
>>http://www.bionicdodge.com
>>
>>'03 Dakota R/T, CC, Black, Bone Stock
>>'04 Liberty, 4x4, 3.7, 5 speed, 3.73 LSD
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:48:09 EST