Re: OT: Dodge Charger

From: Josh Battles (josh@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2005 - 10:05:08 EST


"andy levy" <andy-dml@levyclan.us> wrote in message
>
> Real Charger pics: http://www.chryslerweblog.com/index.php?p=63

That looks like a bastardized Magnum/300 and I don't like it. The front end
is ugly and overall it doesn't share a single body cue with any vehicle that
has worn the Charger nameplate. Chrysler screwed up, again.

So far nobody but Ford has gotten the retro look done the right way. The
GTO is rather lackluster, and the new C6 would have been better off staying
a C5 on the outside. Who knows what's to become of the Camaro... I'm not
going to hold my breath on that one either. Some of the sketches I've seen
look *really* nice, but in the end it'll probably be some boring front wheel
drive 6-cylinder.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
Above Statement Not True    ^^^^^
www.omg-stfu.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 00:18:31 EST