i disagree... so far, the SRT lineup has been extended to new, marquee name
vehicles (with the exception of the SRT-4, which was added to a pre-existing
line).
all DC is doing is offering a performance version of the vehicles. man, i
think it's sacreligious to say that there TOO MUCH performance going around.
all an SRT Dakota would do is increase attention to our model, since it
would most definitely be the fastest, most powerful truck in its class.
Gabriel A. Couriel
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of
Olznut@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:21 PM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: SRT Dakota & Durango
In a message dated 5/18/2005 7:12:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
andy-dml@levyclan.us writes:
Anyone else think Chrysler's going too far w/ the SRT stuff? Do we
really need an SRT edition of *every* vehicle?
- --
- -andy
I'm kinda with you on that, although I think it's cool they're giving every
vehicle a hefty taste of power and cool, I think they should back it down a
bit. Jeep SRT imo is crossing the line. I think the SRT should be the R/T.
Ed "Olznut" Halterman Sunland, Ca '03 Ram Laramie 2500 Quad Cab 4x4 Long
Bed
HEMI "Big Red" '66 Olds F-85 330 V-8, Intense Blue "Project Olds" Will Be
Finished Soon.......
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 05:44:45 EDT