RE: Re: Going to Synthetic at 80,000 mi

From: Rick Barnes (rascal@scrtc.com)
Date: Sat Sep 17 2005 - 09:04:19 EDT


Well, its good to be passionate about what you believe in and all that. I
still say, not one manufacturer recommends amsoil in any new vehicle and if
it is superior, why not? Cost? No way I believe that.

Rascal

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Barry Oliver
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:05 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Going to Synthetic at 80,000 mi

david.clement@verizon.net wrote:
> Nothing wrong with Amsoil other than the price.
> ...
>
> Dave Clement
> 99 SLT+ CC 4x4
>

That should have read: "Nothing wrong with Amsoil other than their
pushers/apostles."

No shot at listers, actually, I have a buddy that is an Amsoil dealer,
and except for that, he's a decent guy. But God help me if I mention
anything relating to oil or engines or anything similar in front of him.
  He will evangelize on the wonders of Amsoil for hours.. I seriously
suspect he bathes in the stuff he is so obsessed with it, Ugh. Although
it is kinda fun to mess with him and send someone to ask about his Amway
oil and filter deal...heh heh, heh.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 01 2005 - 12:50:23 EDT