I would say Creighton is objective as he has hundreds of footnotes
throughout his book proving his points, whereas Moore's ridiculous claims
were pathetically easy to refute, no proof at all. Moore lied, (and I am
NOT a Republican). Creighton carefully researched and has mountains of
proof.
I take truth to be so with proof, not heresay. If you cannot distinguish
those differences, its no wonder you stay in lurk.
Rascal
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bob Crockett
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 7:06 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: "State of Fear" - Creighton & Moore
Creighton is as objective as Michael Moore. If ya know and understand
their biases, there can be some good reading. However, if ya want to
take thier words as gospel truth and base your arguments on that - well
ya lost me there, pal.
I maintain that the sky is NOT falling, but nonetheless, we should
certainly be looking at these environmental and political issues with as
much clarity as we can muster up.
Peace - with Vigilance!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 01 2005 - 12:50:23 EDT