Terrible Tom said:
>
> -- -Jon- .-- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com
> --. | 67 Coronet, 70 Cuda, 90 Dakota 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dakota | | 96
> Intruder 1400, 96 Kolb FireFly, 99 Cherokee, 01 Ram 3500 CTD |
> `------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com --'
>
>
> Just a nitpick hehe - I noticed some time ago, that in your sigline (and
> I've made it a personal priority to keep closer watch on what your
> sigline has in it from now on) your Cherokee is not specified as a 4x4.
> As I analyze your sigline... I notice that you have identified your 92
> Ram as a 4x4, and all your two wheel drive vehicles are identified by
> their lack of a drive designation. Thus I conclude your system for
> labeling non 4 wheel drive vehicles is to simply not label them, and
> instead - differentiate them by specifying only 4x4's as such.
>
> Well having said all that - - the Cherokee did in fact some in two wheel
> drive versions! And as such that you did not specify your Cherokee as a
> 4x4, your system of non-labeling would indicate its a two wheel drive
> Jeep! Which we know it is NOT! lol
>
> You MUST set the balance of nature straight and equalize the cosmos, and
> add the distinguishing mark of "4x4" in your sigline for your 99 Cherokee!
>
> Ya can'na change the laws 'o physics!!!
If he would have specified the Cherokee as a 4x4, it would have caused
registration issues with the "box" around the sig.
-- - Josh www.omg-stfu.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 10:10:44 EST