Josh Battles wrote:
> On Sat, December 31, 2005 12:27 am, Terrible Tom wrote:
>
>>a 46RH is what I have - that is toasted in the 1995 that I bought - that
>>is the transmission that I am looking for - I'm not looking to get a
>>44RH built. I'm looking to get a 46RH built - and as far as I knew -
>>there was no 44RH offered in the Daks... only a 42 and a 46.
>
>
> I'll ask around for you, I know a bunch of trans guys, maybe I can help you
> out. I'll give you a call after the new year.
Awesome! Thanks dude :D Yeah I wouldn't think twice about coming down
to Chicago to take care of the tranny stuff. cool :)
>>Gotta admit I don't know who you are talking about? :D clue me in?
>
>
> GTFO. Serious? http://www.thefastman.com/
>
> Dan's a good guy and he really knows his stuff. It would definately be a
> good idea to see if he can help you out.
>
Ahhh that fastman! heh - I didn't make the connection between the
throttle bodies heh...
Der.. I'm kunfoosed sumtimes!
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rocks are for skipping... I'm all about the mud 75 Honda CL360, 89 Dakota, 89 Dakota 4x4, 95 Dakota 4x4, 01 Ram 4x4 http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/ AIM & Yahoo: SilverEightynine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 01 2006 - 00:39:44 EST