Re: Another transmission question

From: Terrible Tom (SilverEightynine@aol.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 01:41:46 EST


sneezer@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <441EC106.6050304@aol.com>, SilverEightynine@aol.com (Terrible Tom)
> writes:
>
>>
>>Is here any reason anyone can think of - why a 46RH from a Ram won't
>>work in Dakota behind a 318? I've been looking for trannies to replace
>>the roasted one I have, and all the and salvage yards are telling me Ram
>>trannies are not indicated as being compatible with Dakotas? WTF?
>
>
>
> I was told the bellhousing was different on a Ram tranny, would not fit in a
> Dak. This came from Wayne at APS a couple years ago. The guts are the same
> though. At least that was the case with a GenII Dak.
>
> Kevin

Hmmmm I know the bell housings are different between 2wd and 4x4 Dakotas
but I did't think they would be different between Daks and Rams. I'll
have to investigate further.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rocks are for skipping... I'm all about the mud
75 Honda CL360, 89 Dakota, 89 Dakota 4x4,
95 Dakota 4x4, 96 Neon, 01 Ram 4x4
http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/
AIM & Yahoo: SilverEightynine

. . .------------------------------------------------------------------. | Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! | | Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net | `------------------------------------------------------------------'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 02 2006 - 18:27:15 EDT