Terrible Tom wrote:
> Do you know if it was driven on low fluid? if it was then you may be
> looking at toasty transmission. Do you have a 44RH? or a 46RH? Much to
> my dismay I've learned they stuck the 44RH (basically a slightly
> stronger offshoot variant of the blasted A-500), behind early Gen IIIs
> with 318s.
Correcting my own post here - that would be 44RE or 46RE, not the H versions
-- ------------------------------------------------------------- "The word, is no. I am therefore going anyway." - James T. Kirk75 Honda CL360, 89 Dakota, 89 Dakota 4x4, 95 Dakota 4x4, 96 Neon, 01 Ram 4x4 http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/ AIM & Yahoo: SilverEightynine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 01 2007 - 14:53:53 EST