Gee let me put a new 4.7 in my Gen III and I'd be happy :)
Kenneth M. Berntsen
eMail - kenneth@berntsen.cc
>
> the answer to my question:
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/47.html
>
>
> Gabriel A. Couriel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Gabriel A.
> Couriel
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:31 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: RE: DML: 2008 Dak preview
>
>
>
> i wonder if the new 4.7L engine has 3-valve heads... would be interesting to
> see. also, i wonder if those 290hp are on premium or regular... i'd be
> pissed if you can get a higher-powered 4.7L, using regular gas...
>
> Gabriel A. Couriel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Garret
> Lewis
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:08 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: RE: DML: 2008 Dak preview
>
>
>
> Well, I think that the new 2008 truck looks better than the current Dak
> (don't mean to offend anyone on the list driving one). I may not be 100%
> totally sold on the look; but, it is going in the right direction. It is
> nice to see that the truck can run on E85; however, in Virginia you don't
> have but a few places that sell E85. A diesel Dak would have been nice.
> Dahlmer-Chrysler should have been able to pull that one off. Diesel
> Liberty, diesel Mercedes, new diesel jeep vehicle, and should be diesel
> Dakota. That would have gotten my attention.
>
> Garret
> 1997 4x4, V8, CC
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 00:44:23 EST