The belt and water pump would be the same...but the brakes, hoses, and
bearings are different. Plugs, wires, oil filter, oil are the same though.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Kramarsky [mailto:dkramarsky68@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 10:54 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Questions on '99 to '01 Durangos ( looking to buy
)
Brian and rest,
I thought if I went with the '99 or '00 Durango 4x2 5.2L, lots of stuff
would be similar
to my 1992 Dakota 5.2L.
In that way, if the Durango needed service ( belts, hoses, water pumps,
brakes,
bearings, spark plugs, oil changes, etc) I would have some, if not all, of
the parts
already.
Plus I wouldn't have to learn a lot of new things about the new vehicle.
I was trying to keep things simple. Does this line of thinking seem wrong?
Or should I
go with Caravan still?
-dan k.
Dan K.
Vehicle: 1992 Dakota Club Cab LE Color: Two-tone silver Engine:
5.2L EFI
Options: A/C, Cruise, PS, PB, PW, PL, 3.55 gear, 46RH, tinted rear slider.
Mods: Home-brew CAI, March Performance pulley set, K&N Filters, 180*
T-stat, relocated IAT, DynoMax Super Turbo Exhaust Kit, Hi-Flow Cat,
Autolite plugs & wires, Gates hoses & belts.
Photo: http://static.flickr.com/42/84856795_c18903d10f.jpg
Whats Next: Mopar Performance PCM, 3.91 rear gear with LSD, electric fan,
KYB shocks, re-paint body, 2/4 drop kit.
______________________________________________________________________
______________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 00:38:35 EST
