In the old days the responce would have been to declare war, now wars
are less about nations and alliances and more about ideas.
Unfortunately guns don't do much against ideas, the best you can do is
kill or weaken those who are so militant about them.
On 2/10/08, Tom Byrne <kerib@ptd.net> wrote:
>
> That is the difference between the U.S declaring war and someone committing
> an act of aware against us.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Azie L. Magnusson" <maggie11@mchsi.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 7:12 PM
> Subject: DML: war
>
>
> >
> > James Z writes: >> > While I agree that there is "war" currently going
> > on, you have missed my point entirely. I was referring to an actual WAR
> > as defined by our Constitution, in other words, one "declared" by
> > Congress. <<
> >
> > Technically you are correct.. I consider that when our Homeland is
> > "Bombed" by a people and innocent US citizens are killed as a result and
> > we send our Military in Harms way, that I consider to be War. Maybe not
> > properly declared, but when I am being shot @ or being targeted by IED's
> > it is in my estimation WAR.
> > I've learned.... That one should keep his
> > words both soft and tender, because tomorrow he may have to eat them.
> >
> > Azie
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST