Re: The bottom line is,the 2nd Generation Dakota IS the best (1997-2004),,Ya Whatever

From: \ (dodgedakotaquadcab@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2008 - 17:30:21 EST


The 87-96 are basically the same,except for power
changes,etc.My Blue Thunder will whip the stuffin out
of u 1st generation guyys....

Uh-Ohh,here comes a shell now....DUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- jon@dakota-truck.net wrote:

>
> "Don Rey" <radon220@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Uh oh... two somewhat controversial statements on
> a particularly volatile DML.
>
>
> Woohoo! Now if someone can just manage to work in
> a reference to
> "he who shall not be named", we'll give that China
> thread a run for
> its money! Ummm, oops. :-)
>
>
> > James, I can never remember what the official DML
> standing is on
> > generation listings. I personally see a huge
> difference between the 90
> > dak and the 92 (with 91 being a transitional year
> where the body was
> > modified... significantly in my eyes). So I'd
> agree with your Gen II
> > definition.
>
>
> I was going to direct your attention to the FAQ:
>
>
> http://faq.dakota-truck.net/General/generations.html
>
>
> But unfortunately, its a tad out of date and
> leaves off with the
> GenIII, so I will paraphrase the official DML
> breakdown here:
>
> Gen1: 1987-1990
> Gen2: 1991-1996
> Gen3: 1997-2004
> Gen4: 2005-present
>
>
> > Digger, I much prefer the REAL daks over the '96+
> fairy trucks ;-)
>
>
> Hey now, thems fightin' wurds! (Or did you mean
> '97+?) :-)
>
>
> --
> -Jon-
>
> .- Jon Steiger -- jon@dakota-truck.net or
> jon@jonsteiger.com -.
> | '96 Kolb Firefly, '96 Suzuki Intruder,
> Miscellaneous Mopars |
> `--------------------------------
> http://www.jonsteiger.com --'
>
>

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST