RE: RE: 3.9/5.2/5.9 Waterpumps...flowkooler?

From: Brian (hskr@cox.net)
Date: Sat Sep 13 2008 - 23:40:45 EDT


Exactly, so IMO, not worth the extra price they want for the flowkooler
water pump. The stock pump already flows enough and is designed to work
with the stock cooling system.

brian cropp
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Dustin
Williams
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:32 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: 3.9/5.2/5.9 Waterpumps...flowkooler?

Same idea as a larger intake or exhaust on a stock engine (both is of
course a different story). Fluid only flows as fast or works as well
as the most restrictive point in the system. There may be slight
gains, but it's minimal at best with out upgrading flow of the whole
system.

On 9/12/08, Brian <hskr@cox.net> wrote:
>
> No need for it unless you also upgrade the rest of your cooling system.
> Even with a higher flowing pump, you will still be limited by the
efficiency
> of your coolant blend, your radiator, and your t-stat. Water is cooled
down
> in the radiator as it flows through. If you make the water flow through
the
> radiator faster, it's not going to cool down faster because it spends less
> time in the radiator.
>
> brian cropp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> msnbcnnbcbs@hotmail.com
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:21 AM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: 3.9/5.2/5.9 Waterpumps...flowkooler?
>
>
> I haven't been around for a while, so I don't know what the general
> consensus
> is about this now.
>
> Is Flowkooler still recommended over a stock waterpump? My 2003 R/T's
> waterpump
> is on the way out (weep hole leaking).
>
> Should I pay extra and get the Flowkooler or go with a stock pump? Any
> problems
> with the FlowKooler?
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1668 - Release Date: 9/12/2008
> 6:56 AM
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1669 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 2:18 PM



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 01 2008 - 00:13:23 EDT