Re: RE: 3.9/5.2/5.9 Waterpumps...flowkooler?

From: Dustin Williams (dustinewilliams@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 13 2008 - 23:31:41 EDT


Same idea as a larger intake or exhaust on a stock engine (both is of
course a different story). Fluid only flows as fast or works as well
as the most restrictive point in the system. There may be slight
gains, but it's minimal at best with out upgrading flow of the whole
system.

On 9/12/08, Brian <hskr@cox.net> wrote:
>
> No need for it unless you also upgrade the rest of your cooling system.
> Even with a higher flowing pump, you will still be limited by the efficiency
> of your coolant blend, your radiator, and your t-stat. Water is cooled down
> in the radiator as it flows through. If you make the water flow through the
> radiator faster, it's not going to cool down faster because it spends less
> time in the radiator.
>
> brian cropp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> msnbcnnbcbs@hotmail.com
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:21 AM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: 3.9/5.2/5.9 Waterpumps...flowkooler?
>
>
> I haven't been around for a while, so I don't know what the general
> consensus
> is about this now.
>
> Is Flowkooler still recommended over a stock waterpump? My 2003 R/T's
> waterpump
> is on the way out (weep hole leaking).
>
> Should I pay extra and get the Flowkooler or go with a stock pump? Any
> problems
> with the FlowKooler?
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1668 - Release Date: 9/12/2008
> 6:56 AM
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 01 2008 - 00:13:23 EDT