I guess I'm looking more for "yeah, it made my idle smoother" or "yeah,
it helped power at xxx rpm", or better yet "the stock coil sucks,
anything is better" ;) Mine is working fine, I was just looking to see
if it was worth the $45 dropped on it. Though if Chrysler went to a
similar output on new trucks, perhaps that's all I need to know...
Biff Byrum wrote:
>
> I checked the specs out on those. If you have a 1997 up Magnum engine,
> you essentially have that coil.
>
> But for the 1996 and back Magnums, the 140021 is about a 20%
> improvement in output.
>
> 97 to 99 coils may have used up some of their life, and you could see
> an improvement.
>
> But for a well tuned 96 and back engine, I would guess you will see a
> performance improvement. Biff Byrum
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Beazer"
> <teseract@moparhowto.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:45 PM
> Subject: DML: Accel stock coil replacement - Any good?
>
>
>
>> Anyone tried one of these?
>>
>> http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ACC-140021/
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone saw any improvment at all if the stock coil
>> was already in good shape.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> MattB
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 14:24:03 EDT