don't waste your money...all a coil does is create a spark, you won't
notice any difference
Rascal
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Matt Beazer <teseract@moparhowto.com> wrote:
>
>
> I guess I'm looking more for "yeah, it made my idle smoother" or "yeah, it helped power at xxx rpm", or better yet "the stock coil sucks, anything is better" ;) Mine is working fine, I was just looking to see if it was worth the $45 dropped on it. Though if Chrysler went to a similar output on new trucks, perhaps that's all I need to know...
>
> Biff Byrum wrote:
>>
>> I checked the specs out on those. If you have a 1997 up Magnum engine, you essentially have that coil.
>>
>> But for the 1996 and back Magnums, the 140021 is about a 20% improvement in output.
>>
>> 97 to 99 coils may have used up some of their life, and you could see an improvement.
>>
>> But for a well tuned 96 and back engine, I would guess you will see a performance improvement. Biff Byrum
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Beazer" <teseract@moparhowto.com>
>> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:45 PM
>> Subject: DML: Accel stock coil replacement - Any good?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Anyone tried one of these?
>>>
>>> http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ACC-140021/
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if anyone saw any improvment at all if the stock coil
>>> was already in good shape.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> MattB
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 14:24:03 EDT