Jason Bleazard <dml@bleazard.net> wrote:
> Michael Maskalans wrote:
>>
>> C.A.R.S. + absolutely *MINT* 4x4 Dakota convertible = tear
> Makes me wonder how much trouble someone would be in for breaking in and
> rescuing some of these from death row (not that I would advocate
> breaking the law). Considering there's a $15k penalty to the dealership
> for failing to destroy the engine, I have a sneaking suspicion that
> taking a "clunker" would be punished more harshly than stealing a new car.
> There's something backwards about that.
Its amazing how stupid people can be, except when the government is
involved, then its basically expected. But still... Taking that
truck in to be destroyed has got to be right up there near the top of
my list of stupid things I've seen.
I believe the dealership provides the credit to the customer and
gets reimbursed by the gov't program. I wonder if it would be
possible for someone to walk in there and offer the dealership the
$4500 (or $5K to make it worth their while) instead. That covers the
dealer's cost, so the only question would be if the paperwork could be
stopped.
Hmmmm....
Does anyone know what happens to these vehicles after the engine is
destroyed? The gov't isn't buying them, right? They only care that
the engine has been destroyed? I have heard that its OK to use them
for parts and such. Does the dealership still own the vehicle
afterward, and if so, what are they doing with them? Here is where
I'm going with this... Is there anything to stop someone from buying
this vehicle and dropping a new engine in it? Or does the VIN
basically get banished to never-never land?
--
-Jon-
.- Jon Steiger -- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com -.
| '96 Kolb Firefly, '96 Suzuki Intruder, Miscellaneous Mopars |
`-------------------------------- http://www.jonsteiger.com --'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 00:06:00 EDT