Re: Moog vs. Stock

From: ffastje (ffastje@cox.net)
Date: Tue Aug 11 2009 - 08:11:17 EDT


Matt Beazer wrote:
>
> For those of you who are cheap and wonder why people pay extra for a
> name brand, look at this (fuzzy, grainy, taken at 3am) picture of a
> Moog vs. the stock Pitman arm that came off my Dakota:
>
> http://www.moparhowto.com/pictures/1995-Dakota/pitman_moog_vs_stock.jpg
>
> Unless the stock one is made out of titanium, I'd have to say that the
> Moog is a little stronger. So those of you temped by the "steering
> rebuilt kits" on E-bay, remember that not all replacement parts are
> equal. :)
>
> MattB
>
>
>
>
I also had that when I went to pick up the ball joints they tried to
give me the lower priced ones. the moog were easily 50% stronger.

-- 
ffastje@cox.net
ffastje@gmail.com
1999 dakota cc 3.9L 4X4 
63,106 miles



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 00:06:01 EDT