Re: 97 Dakota Engine and Transmission Replacement

From: John Dunlap (jsdunlap@roadkill.org)
Date: Sat Aug 29 2009 - 16:57:12 EDT


I believe after removing all the front end stuff that together would
be quicker and easier. Need at least four hands though so get a friend
that don't mind getting knuckles a little bruised. I like it better
that way on full size trucks. Just a lot simpler in the long run.
Everything from motor to tranny is already matched up and the intake
extras can be added later. Leave linkage off if it's a standard.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Ken & Janet Olson <olsonfam@iserv.net> wrote:
>
> I'm putting the engine and transmission back into my '97 Dakota (V-6 auto). Anybody have any experience  as to would I be better off putting this in as one assembly or trans and engine seperate?  I'd rather do it together if it can be done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken
>

--
QUOTING...   James Bovard

"Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 00:06:01 EDT