SilverEightynine@aol.com wrote:
> http://autos.aol.com/article/chrysler-business-plan-2009
>
> Not happy with what I am seeing...
>
>
>
>
"Unibody" and "Truck" don't really go hand in hand in my opinion. I
have no great love for the styling of the post-2004 Dakota, but at least
they're TRUCKS, not some city-boy poser-mobile.
It'll be a watered down Honda-Ridgeline like thing with a V6 as it's top
option and won't tow more than 3500lbs probably. I always had the
opinion that the Dakota was intentionally under-rated for towing as to
not compete with the full size trucks. That won't be true much longer.
MattB
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 18:23:04 EST