On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:19 AM, conv442@earthlink.net wrote:
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>> I'm pretty sure the MT and AT are different lengths so you'd need
>> shaft work.
>>
>> Rebuilding the AT probably wouldn't be too bad, and it does save you
>> removal of one transmission and driveshaft work.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> Is there a wheelbase difference between the RT and CC? If not why
> not just swap the shaft with the tranny?
> Is the AT an RHxxx or RExxx? If it's RExxx you will be getting
> check engine light.
big difference in wheelbase between a regular and extended cab, which
is what he's looking at in this case.
a blown trans won't give you codes just because it's blown. bad bands
or clutches don't give any pressure issues which is all an RE knows
about. Again, doesn't apply in this case, a '93 will have a hydraulic
trans. I don't know if it is an A500 or a 42RH though. I also don't
know if that makes any difference - wasn't it nearly a change in name/
designation only between those?
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 01 2010 - 14:08:15 EST