Yes... but this wouldn't BE a Dakota. ;)
They should have done it. I've seen it done in 3rd gen trucks by guys
who had the will and the cash. But yeah, Chrysler would never do it.
M.B.
On 12/23/2010 05:03 PM, Brian wrote:
>
> You will never see the Hemi in the Dakota, so just keep dreaming there.
>
>
>
> brian cropp
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of M.B.
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 4:30 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Ohhhh noooooooo
>
>
>
>
>
> If they named it something different and dropped the Hemi into it for an
> R/T and SRT-8 version I'd be ok with it... kind of like a Aussie "UTE"
> that way. But a Dakota is a truck and that thing is not a truck.
>
> On 12/23/2010 04:18 PM, Brian wrote:
>>
>> I kind of like that rendering. But they need to just kill off the Dakota
>> name and come up with something new. The Dakota isn't what it used to be
>> and Dodge has priced it out of competition. The '97-'03 Dakota was the
>> "glory years" for the Dakota.
>>
>>
>>
>> brian cropp
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of M.B.
>> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 3:17 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>> Subject: DML: Ohhhh noooooooo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please, please not let this be accurate...
>>
>> http://www.allpar.com/trucks/ram/dakota-2012.html
>>
>> _____
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3332 - Release Date: 12/22/10
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3334 - Release Date: 12/23/10
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 16:31:13 EST