RE: Taking the next step.

From: Schelling, Paul M (SchellinPM@corning.com)
Date: Mon Oct 14 1996 - 15:07:00 EDT


Robert Allen wrote:

>To Whom It May Offend:
>
>1) Mr. Elliott (or, maybe, Jane): The intent was humorous. No offense
> intended. As we have never met, I don't see how you could have taken
> any of this personally.

Not being able to see or hear you, we need some other way to tell (for
sure)
that you are joking. There are a number of ways to do this.

>2) Mailing list at large: As I have no idea how far these posts go.
> Perhaps somewhere in the world the term 'bite me' is inexcusably
> vulgar...

Only if we can't tell (for sure) that you are joking.

>4) Yep, some inconsiderate moron did send a 1.8 meg file...

A lot of mailers these days can handle .BMP files, etc. I find them to
be
a great way to communicate something not easily expressed in words
(one picture speaks a thous... etc.). So my question is: What is the
largest
attached file size that can be sent without p**sing too many people off?

>5) Okay, I give up, I'll quietly listen about pickemup trucks.

No, please. Continue to chime in.

>...It's Just a Truck

Got that right!

 - Paul Schelling
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:26 EDT