Re: World's Fastest Dakota...?

From: DesignTech@worldnet.att.net
Date: Tue Jan 28 1997 - 16:38:50 EST


don't you think that is a little hard to believe. did you take the body off
and run a stripped frame with a good set of slicks?

----------
> From: JERRY S DALTON <XGLT71A@prodigy.com>
> To: dakota@sseg.ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: World's Fastest Dakota...?
> Date: Sunday, January 26, 1997 11:52 AM
>
> Hate to burst anyones bubble but my Dakota runs 13:20's now and with
> a little luck in the 12's next year. Now for the kicker, it is
> naturally asperated and no NOS! It still has the stock 92 Magnum 318
> with only the valvesprings from the aftermarket. It still passes
> Missouri safety and emmisions inspections. So to me 13:30's with a
> huffer doesn't do a thing. If I wanted to spend $2,500 on one I could
> run in the low 12's and even a possible 11 if conditions were right.
> But I didn't need to spend $2,500 for 13's.
>
>
> << Start of Forwarded message via prodigy (R) mail >>
>
> From: Kukukooter
> Subject: Re: World's Fastest Dakota...?
> Date: 01/26
> Time: 02:17 AM
>
> Return-Path: Kukukooter@aol.com
> Received: from sseg.ait.fredonia.edu (root@sseg.ait.fredonia.edu [141.
> 238.20.18]) by pimaia1y.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id
> CAA23384; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 02:15:59 -0500
> From: Kukukooter@aol.com
> Received: from emout14.mail.aol.com (emout14.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.
> 40]) by sseg.ait.fredonia.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA11348
> for <dakota@sseg.ait.fredonia.edu>; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 01:43:41 -0500
> Received: (from root@localhost)
> by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
> id BAA11824;
> Sun, 26 Jan 1997 01:43:12 -0500 (EST)
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 01:43:12 -0500 (EST)
> Message-ID: <970126014312_817196389@emout14.mail.aol.com>
> To: jghunter@nol.net, dakota@sseg.ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: World's Fastest Dakota...?
>
> In a message dated 97-01-25 21:33:55 EST, jghunter@nol.net (Jules
> Glogovcsan)
> writes:
>
> << but the proposed mid7 dak was anything but stock and epa legal and
> i
> think the blown dakota is... >>
> I could easily build a 340 with a 6.71 blower my buddy is selling
> complete
> and lighten my Dak up 300 lbs and run 6.6's and 10 flats, but I
> would
> consider that cheating, that's why I choose to stick with the Magnum
> and CARB
> approval stickers. My challenge to 1BAD DAK was that my performance
> cost much
> less
> than his, dollar for dollar. His truck ran 13.30's I believe, come
> February,
> we'll see if I am close to that.
> Kuk
>
>
> << End of Forwarded message >>
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:30 EDT