Re: Back to the gas question...

From: DesignTech@worldnet.att.net
Date: Wed Feb 19 1997 - 17:19:29 EST


whoa, hold on a sec...
you mean that 93 costs 30 cents more than 89

here in nj 87 is about $1.23
89 is $1.36 and 92 is $1.43
that is only 7 cents more

i think 89 is a rip off cuz it is only 2 more than 87 but costs damn near
93
----------
> From: Rader <rlr@bbt.com>
> To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: Back to the gas question...
> Date: Wednesday, February 19, 1997 4:50 PM
>
> DesignTech@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>
> > i noticed that if i put a quart of kerosene (yes ...kerosene) in my 22
gal
> > tank with the 87 octane, the noise is virtually eliminated. when i
don't
> > put the kerosenne in, the noise comes back
>
> Kerosene, huh? The 1-K stuff they sell for heaters?
>
> You're running the true dual exhausts, right? Do you still have
> the cats? I'm a little leery running kerosene in a stock engine.
>
> > with 93 the ping is minimal but with 94 (Sunoco) it is GONE
>
> Yeah, but I don't want to have to dump $0.30/gal more if I don't
> have to.
>
> I'll probably continue running 89 until late March or early April,
> and see if the summer formula 87 works fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:32 EDT