Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55

• Next message: Robert Garcia: "Re: DT header question"
• Previous message: Robert P. Agnew: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Maybe in reply to: Brian Jeffords: "Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Next in thread: Keith R Wanderi: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Excellent advice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you're gonna go, ya may as well go in
style!

===================='97 Dakota SLT+=====================

                           L. John Morris<ljohn@alltel.net>
                        !!!!! ... your local *HEMI* owner ...!!!!!
           White/Driftwood/CC/4x4/5.2L/5spd/3.92SG/FIPK clone

==================== Reply Separator ====================

>
> Some good advice ... forget the 6 and order the V8 with the 3.55.
>

• Next message: Robert Garcia: "Re: DT header question"
• Previous message: Robert P. Agnew: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Maybe in reply to: Brian Jeffords: "Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Next in thread: Keith R Wanderi: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs 3.55"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:40 EDT