Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs

From: Jane or Larry Elliott (elliott@serv.net)
Date: Sat May 10 1997 - 23:14:10 EDT

Next message: BesameMcho@aol.com: "Greetings!!!"
Previous message: Brian Cleary: "Re: ?? Re Payload Package & Brake Sys."
In reply to: Phil McClay: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Next in thread: Bryan M Nored: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Reply: Bryan M Nored: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Like I said in my earlier post the V8's get better mileage than the V6's,
Phil gets 20 mpg with his V8, I get 18 to 19 mpg with my V6 at 70 to 75
mph which is legal/legalish in WA state.

Larry.

Next message: BesameMcho@aol.com: "Greetings!!!"
Previous message: Brian Cleary: "Re: ?? Re Payload Package & Brake Sys."
In reply to: Phil McClay: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Next in thread: Bryan M Nored: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Reply: Bryan M Nored: "Re: Rear Axle Ratio 3.21 vs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:40 EDT