John Lull wrote:
>
> We're getting ready to replacy my wife's Camry with a Dakota std. cab,
> V6, auto, 3.55, and are having a little trouble deciding which payload
> option to get.
>
> 1. Do I understand correctly that the larger rear brakes and tires
> come *only* with the 2600 lb option?
>
> 2. Does either option compromise handling of the vehicle compared to
> the standard 1250 lb rating? It doesn't bother me at all if it rides
> like a truck, but I would like it to handle well.
>
> 3. Do any of the payload options include heavy duty shocks, rear sway
> bar, etc?
>
> We do mostly freeway driving, with light loads, but occasionally need
> to haul a load of dirt or rocks big enough to severely over-strain my
> current truck (77 Toyota w. 272,000 miles). If *necessary*, we can
> split such loads up, but I'd rather not if I don't have to. I realize
> the V6 & 3.55 rear end are going to be a touch underpowered with a ton
> in the back, but I can live with that. What I can't live with is a
> vehicle that's not going to handle predictably in an emergency,
> especially when nearly empty.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> John
Hi John,
I don't know how the different payload options will affect handling but
my 94 Sport w/V6 handles well. I've had the bed full of dirt and
recently hauled about 1500lbs of brick and the V6 pulls remarkedly
well. It doesn't even grunt when accelerating. It may not be a V8 but
I have been very happy with the all around performance. When I used to
commute I averaged 21-22mpg in rush hour traffic, where it took an hour
to go 29 miles. I feel you'll be happy with the six.
Jay
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:52 EDT