>
>I dont know you Rob, and I'm sure you're a great guy, in fact I think you
>may have answered a question of mine a while back. Howerver I don't see how
>you can get that kinda mileage out of a "97 V8 SLT 4x4". I suppose if you
>drove with a 50 mph tail wind or something but thats contrary to just about
>every other post on the MPG subject and its 10-15% better than I get with a
>V-6. No offense mind you I'm not calling you a liar but the facts just dont
>jibe.
>
>+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
>+ +
>+ Tony Mastres, Photographer, Instructional Development +
>+ +
>+ University of California @ Santa Barbara +
>+ +
>+ +
>+ __ +
>+ []_.-' (Q,___\ +
>+ *********`(o) >>>}__(o)s> +
>+ +
>+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
>
Tony:
For an obviously educated man, you don't appear too bright. Firstly, not
all members of this list are in the USA, many of us are in Canada. For most
of us, miles per gallon is still the measure of fuel consumption. Litres
per 100 km is meaningless to me. I indicated that my mileage was in
IMPERIAL (Canadian) GALLONS which is approximately 20% larger than the US
gallon and meaningful to Canadian members.
Thus, I an not a LIAR, perhaps you are a fool. Your apology is accepted.
Rob Agnew
ragnew@islandnet.com
Victoria, B.C.
Canada
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:52 EDT