>
> I think all you stick-shifter headed guys have got it all wrong. Its not
> that we who prefer automatics like having a big tub of pressurized oil
> shifting the gears for us, its that we like NOT having to clutch
> continously! ( some of us at least) So as Carl wrote:
>
> >>In the same issue, there was an article on the Ferrari F355 paddle
> shifters. Nice, but >>guess what? They're STILL manuals, not automatics.
> They don't use a clutch, but they >>also don't use hydraulic fluid stuff
> like the autos.
>
> Who cares if "Its still a MANUAL" Ghast! I don't give a %@&*$%# if it
> runs on ozone or peanut butter if it lasts and I can cruise along and shift
> gears bang, bang with the push of a button I'm all for it. When can I get
> one in my Dak
>
> +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> + +
> + Tony Mastres, Photographer, Instructional Development +
> + +
> + University of California @ Santa Barbara +
> + +
> + +
> + __ +
> + []_.-' (Q,___\ +
> + *********`(o) >>>}__(o)s> +
> + +
> +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Precisely, it's having to fool with a clutch, especially in heavy traffic
in the morning, that I dislike, and is why I prefer an auto, and since I
don't envision being able to afford the ferrari, with it's clutchless
tranny anytime soon, I'll stick with an auto.
Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:55 EDT