>From: Tim Roller
>starwolf@bewellnet.com
>
>Hey Rob, I have the '95 SLT+ model with ALL the options except the
overhead grouping( I have power sunroof) and the biggest advantage over the
new(96-98) models is that the '95 was the last year you could change out
the computer module. The newer models you have to go into the dealer and
have them hook up the computer programmer. Also with the '95 model other
shops are now starting to put out aftermarket accessories for the '90-96
body years.I also have the 3.55 gears and for this model they are excellent
for mid-towing and when I went to visit my parents back in Missouri this
last summer from Colorado Springs I cruised between 75-90 and still got
between 19-25MPG. With only 25,000miles that engine is well broken-in and
is ready for any updates.Good luck on any choice you make, I think that all
DAKS are well made
----------
> From: Rob Agnew <ragnew@islandnet.com>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: 95 Dak CC
> Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 1:56 PM
>
> At 02:41 PM 12/2/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >I've happened upon a '95 CC Super SLT Dak, V8, Auto, A/C, PW, PDL,
> >Tilt, Cruise, Cassette, 3.55 open rear, and O'head convenience gp.
> >with 25000 miles. It doesn't lack much being what I would order if I
> >were ordering one. What are the advantages & disadvantages of the '95
> >in respect to the other years, if any. The truck has what I consider
> >to be a good price - not excellent, but good.
> >
> >Azie
> >
> >
> Old body style compared to 97/98. Were many significant (according to
CC)
> improvements made
> for the 97 model year.
>
>
> Rob Agnew
> ragnew@islandnet.com
>
> Victoria, B.C.
> Canada
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:59 EDT