> > Number of posts have indicated some head scratching going on as to the
R/T's
> > disappointing test numbers. Was wondering just how much a pop would be
> > expected?
> >
> > That is, the 5.9L is only rated 20 hp over the 5.2L, how much
improvement in
> > the numbers should there be?
> >
> >
> > Jim Oitzinger
> > '98 CC 4x4 5.2L 5spd optioned out
> >
> >
>
> I think what everyone is disappointed about is that it didn't even match
> the 318's performance, much less exceed it, right guys?
>
> Bruce
You hit the nail on the head. Although I still would like to see
another magazine test on the R/T to see if they get the same results.
Catlin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:02 EDT