At 02:15 PM 12/16/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>>My 97 is brilliant blue pearlcoat. I have read a lot on the various
>>>newsgroups (e.g. rec.autos.chrysler) about the bad paint jobs in the
>>>early 90's (not just by Chrysler, either). A lot of the problems were
>>>in the blue/black colors, although other colors are problematic.
>>>It is my understanding that the primer changes of the early 90's
>>>have been corrected.
>
>I think those problems were due to developmental problems with the water-
<snip> I would expect a fine finish on a 'Vette,
>a Cadillac, a Lincoln or a Chrysler LHS. We own TRUCKS. TRUCKS go to work,
>play in the mud, parked outside while the wife's car sits cozy in the
>garage. I know it'd be nice to get an A-#1 paint job, but it takes time
>to do that, and time is money. How much more would you pay for a perfect
>paint job? Now ask the whole Dakota customer base [this is a list full of
>enthusiasts].
<snip>
>
>Jim
>'93 4x4 V8
>
>
My Dakota cost more than a Chrysler LHS, I expect a premium paint job that
will last.
Rob Agnew
ragnew@islandnet.com
Victoria, B.C.
Canada
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:03 EDT