On Tue, 03 Mar 1998 20:40:06 -0600, Michael Clark wrote:
>Jack Snodgrass wrote:
>>
>> I haven't got as many responses to the dakota-truck.net as
>> I had hoped to get. I only counted two responses. I think that
>> I'm going to go ahead and get dakota-truck.net anyway and
>> worry about paying for it when the bill comes due.
>>
>> If anyone has any reasons why I should NOT get dakota-truck.net
>> or get dakota-truck.org instead... let me know ASAP. I'm going to
>> request the name on Wed. morning. It should probably be active
>> by Thursday morning.
>>
>> Jack
>
>
>I think org would be more appropriate, as that is the designation for
>organization. Net refers to communications network, for example my ISP
>is wt.net or World Trade Network Inc. or something. The Impalla guys
>have one I think it is www.impallass.org or something to that effect.
>In my opinion org would be more appropriate.
I agree... org would be more appropriate... but net sounds better.
No one enforces .net -vs- .com -vs- .org so if we went with
dakota-truck.net, we would get our hands slapped. As long as
the internic.net gets their $$$ they don't really care one
way or another.
Anyone else an an opinion on the name? I REALLY like dakota-truck.net
more than dakota-truck.org. Not sure why.... anyone else?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:20 EDT