Can't help you with a study of ram vs. cowl, but I can tell you what
I've read about water getting to your breather. I was really concerned
about this when I put a relatively large forward facing scoop on my
first car, a '65 Mustang convertible. Right before I had it installed,
Hot Rod magazine had an article on scoops (in 1981 I believe) that
stated very clearly that unless you were pouring buckets of water
directly onto the breather, don't worry about water getting to your
breather via the scoop. Verbatim, they said "think of it as a cheap form
of water injection". High compression and water injection was pretty
popular back then if I remember correctly. I Had one of those triangular
Edelbrock foam filament breathers positioned directly under the hole in
the hood (big hole, about 12"x18") and never had a problem. A few bugs
on the breather/motor was the biggest inconvenience - washed them off
periodically.
Tate
97 rc 318 3.21
>
> Now granted, I don't know as much as I'd like about this, but for me,
>there is a lot more to this than looks alone. I have the same questions
>as Mike C. and Robert T. about what would keep crap from Ram-Airring
>right into my engine bay and my K&N? Also, Mike's question about
>what happens with cowl induction when it starts raining has got me
>wondering too. (Though I prefer water dripping through my engine
>compartment to it being flung at my K&N at 55mph.) I'm not sure,
>but I think that a ram-air would mostly aim the air at the air
>cleaner, whereas a cowl induction would flood the entire engine
>compartment, not only feeding cold air to the air cleaner, but
>also drawing heat from the heads, headers, and the entire engine
>in general.
>
>
> Surely someone somewhere must have done a study of cowl vs. ram
>at some point? Anyone have any facts?
>
>
> -Jon-
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:23 EDT