At 03:05 PM 5/11/98 -0500, you wrote:
>At 01:15 PM 5/11/98 , you wrote:
>
>>Well what I read in the NY Times said "The world's 5th largest automaker
>>(Chrysler) is being bought out by Germany's largest (Can't remember th
>>adjective they used for Daimler Benz)" so by that CC was 5th BEFORE the
>>merger so they have to be higher up now....
>>
>>Bruce
>>
>
>Why do they HAVE to be higher up now? Whoever was 4th (VW?) could have been
>so far ahead that even this merger wouldn't have caught CC up to them.
>
If the info in the NY Times was correct (which it now seems it wasn't?),
then he's right, CC would have to move up, since VW is one of the top five.
The paper called DB "Germany's largest", which would mean that it is
larger than VW. CC was smaller than VW, but DB was already bigger than
VW, so DB-CC has to be bigger than VW after the merger. (If you look at
it from the CC perspective, it moved up; if you look at it from the DB
perspective, it might not nescessarily move up.) Of course, if the paper
was wrong about DB being larger than VW, then no matter which perspective
you look at it from, CC doesn't "have" to be higher up. (It is possible
that DB was 4th and adding CC wasn't enough to move them past #3. Though
#6 is now #5)
Hee hee hee! (Try thinking that 5 times real fast.) ;-)
-Jon-
.--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu -- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---.
| DoD# 1038, EAA# 518210, NMA# 117376, USUA# A46209, KotWitDoDFAQ, RP-SEL |
| '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT Club Cab, '96 Kolb FireFly 447 (#FF019) |
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------'
I do not speak for the SUNY College at Fredonia; any opinions are my own.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:47 EDT