>
> Even before I read Joe's comment I was going to respond to Jeff on Q1
> with my supposition that a 4 was used. Granted, I don't know if that is
> offered in the DAK.
> But I agree with Jim A. This is one of the opening salvos in the PU and
> SUV wars. Six months ago these same doofuses were saying that because
> PU's and SUV's are higher than passenger cars the passenger cars were
> experiencing increased damage and passengers in same more injuries. Last
> night the doofus (sorry in advance if any one is related) stated that
> passenger cars were safer!
> On Q2, well stated.
> One has to remember who butters these guys bread --- the insurance
> companies. It's merely fodder to enable the insurance companies to raise
> premiums. You can bank on it.
>
> Mark R
> 93 5.2Magnum, CC, LE, slushbox, pigeon hauler
>
>
>
>
I agree with you Mark, I think it's just a scheme to raise insurance on
trucks and SUVS, they couldn't find any test that they did poorly in so
they made up one
Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:47 EDT