Re: Re: 5.9or 5.2?

From: W . Jack Hilton III (hemi@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Jul 07 1998 - 12:00:09 EDT

Next message: rti1pmp@ismd.ups.com: "Re[2]: MML and DML"
Previous message: Lance Martz: "MiniTruckin' Club Directory"
In reply to: Zeag1@aol.com: "Re: 5.9or 5.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

If you had the money for either , I would spend a little more and go with
the 360 .

The only substitute for cubic inches is more cubic inches !

At 02:30 AM 7/7/98 EDT, you wrote:
>Having the budget, what would everyone get if the V6 just wasnt doin it no
>more, the 5.9 or the 5.2?
>
W . Jack Hilton III

HEMI@mindspring.com

Next message: rti1pmp@ismd.ups.com: "Re[2]: MML and DML"
Previous message: Lance Martz: "MiniTruckin' Club Directory"
In reply to: Zeag1@aol.com: "Re: 5.9or 5.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:04 EDT