Re: Shorty vs. Long-tube headers (kinda long)

From: Richard A Pyburn (rap777@juno.com)
Date: Sun Jul 19 1998 - 13:43:09 EDT


On Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:15:50 -0400 Jon Steiger <stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu>
writes:
>At 08:56 AM 7/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
>[...]
>>I'm not trying to start a battle of terms and theories, just that the
>part
>>you mentioned on shorter headers = lower RPM's was backwards. I'm
>personally
>>torn between the DT's and something else that works as well that can
>be
>>coated to try and beat the heat. Preferably stainless so I won't have
>to
>>worry about rust or oxidation blowing them out in just a couple of
>years.
>>
>
> John,
>
> I have heard that the DT's are available without the chrome finish
>so you can just send 'em off to be coated. That would probably save
>some money since the non-chrome headers are probably cheaper, and you
>won't have to pay the coater extra to strip off the chrome. I don't
>know wether the DT's are stainless or not.
>
>
> -Jon-
>
>HPC (high performance coatings has DTs on stock for Dakotas. They quoted
me $660 for voated DTs.

Try them at www.hpc.com

Richard in San Antonio

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:07 EDT