If I get the same exhaust as is on the R/T s I've seen, I will send it
back due to false advertising. The two R/T s I've looked under most
definitely did not have mandrel bent pipe. It might have been 3", but
from the manifolds to the tip, it was just as crooked and crimped as
the pipe on my 97 rc. I even brought it to the attention of one of
the sales associates at the dealership I was at. If the R/T s are
supposed to have mandrel bent pipes, then there are at least two
buyers in Dallas that will not get what was advertised.
Tate
-----Original Message-----
From: |< R |> [SMTP:krp@netnitco.nett]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 2:33 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Dynomax exhaust
> From: "STRICKLAND, Tate" <tstricklan@shl.com>
> To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'"
<dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Subject: DML: Dynomax exhaust
> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:08:15 -0700
> Reply-to: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Ordered a Dynomax 3" y-back system on Friday. Got the cat back with
> UltraFlo muffler, 3" cat converter, and they sent a two foot piece
of
> 3" pipe to take care of the normal cat back system necking down to
> 2.5" where it meets the cat and to join the cat to the y collector.
> System was $319 total including shipping. Any comments? I think
> it's a good deal.
>
> Tate
That's the same system that comes on the stock R/T.
|{eith R. Phelps
Cat..... the other white meat.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:17 EDT