RE: Re: Ram vs. Dakota

From: STRICKLAND, Tate (tstricklan@shl.com)
Date: Wed Sep 16 1998 - 13:12:15 EDT


Not exactly - the carrying capacity of the Dak is exactly the same as=20
a Ram =BD ton.

One is bigger than the other - get the one you like=20
best........................

Tate

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe t [SMTP:fordf-series@juno.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 9:56 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Ram vs. Dakota

On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:52:21 -0400 Rader <rlr@rtp-bosch.com> writes:
>Joe t wrote:
>
>> Which one did you think would be better for a 17 year old to buy.
>
> Holy Shit!
>
> When I was 17, I was worried about keeping my old piece-o-shit '66
>Mustang on the road, and paying for an expensive college education.
>Now that I'm a working geezer who actually has a little coin, I=20
can't
>stand the idea of paying for new vehicles. Then I'm reading about=20
17
>year olds buying new trucks...
>
> I'd go for the Dak, myself, but then again I already did. ;)
>
> Ron
>
So, the Dakota is more of a fun filled adventure truck, and the Ram=20
is
more of a work horse. Right??

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:51 EDT