RE: DAK problems

From: Geoffrey Hackbart (ghack2@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 22 1998 - 11:02:32 EDT


Hey,
Im sorry, I meant the dash. It was late and I wasn't thinking. It is in
the shop now. Getting a few things looked at. Sorry for the mix up.

Later,
Geoffrey
~~~~~98 DAK CC 3.9L~~~~~

>From owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net Tue Sep 22 05:38:35 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net
(8.8.7/8.7.3) id IAA00752 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998
08:21:29 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from buffnet9.buffnet.net (buffnet9.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.19]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id
IAA00748 for <dakota-truck>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by
buffnet9.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
> id xma024668; Tue, 22 Sep 98 08:21:23 -0400
>Received: from docws001.shl.com (docws001.shl.com [159.249.56.252])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA20821
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:22:59 -0400 (EDT)
> (envelope-from tstricklan@shl.com)
>Received: from napmsnoc02.shl.com (napmsnoc02.shl.com [159.249.47.179])
by docws001.shl.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA24586 for
<dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 07:05:09 -0500
>Received: by napmsnoc02.shl.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server
Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52)
> id <01BDE5E8.E4C01990@napmsnoc02.shl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 05:21:46
-0700
>Message-ID:
<c=US%a=MCI%p=SHL%l=DALFW03-980922122049Z-6213@napmsnoc02.shl.com>
>From: "STRICKLAND, Tate" <tstricklan@shl.com>
>To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: RE: DML: DAK problems
>Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 05:20:49 -0700
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version
4.0.995.52
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
>X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
>X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
>X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
majordomo@buffnet.net.
>X-Unsubscribe-URL:
http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
>
>I don't see how the carpet could "come up under the console? Call me
>an idiot - please explain. The 5 spd console I have bolts down with
>two bolts on top of carpet that just lays there - no way for it to
>come up. As for the headliner - they should replace it with no
>problems.
>
>Tate
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael DuBose [SMTP:mdubose@vt.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 12:01 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: DAK problems
>
>
>Geoffrey Hackbart wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I own a 98 CC and I am taking it into the dealer tomorrow, for
>the
>> 5th time since I got it in Feb. Few questions. My carpet is coming
>up
>> under my console. Right under my stereo. This is the third time I
>have
>> taken it in for this, and they still haven't fixed it. Now they are
>> trying to blame it on the people who installed my amp. Has this
>happened
>> to anyone else? (the carpet thing) What could be the problem? Could
>the
>> A/C be leaking?
>> Also, my headliner is bowing down, under my visors. These
>aren't
>> the only things that I am taking it in for either. What should I do?
>I
>> told the service guy that I will be needing a rental and he asked me
>if
>> I had an EW. I said no, but I should get one bcs I have had so many
>> problems with this thing, that it is really starting to piss me
>off.
>> Don't get me wrong, I love my truck, but I got this thing brand new
>with
>> only 53 mis on it. Should this be happening? Should I demand an EW?
>Any
>> info will be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Sorry so long :O)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Geoffrey
>> ~~~~~98 DAK CC 3.9L~~~~~
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>Well I am going to be up front with you and tell you that I am only 18
>years
>old. But I did work for a chrysler dealership for 4 years before
>going to
>college and you have definitly been to the dealership too many times.
> When
>it comes to the carpet you said that it has been back for this problem
>for
>three times?? Have they replaced the carpet?? If not ask them to
>replace
>the carpet. They shouldn't give you any greef because they don't lose
>any
>money because chrysler pays for all of it. Now when it comes to an EW
>i
>would get one. I have see too many people come to the shop and want
>something fixed (normally it is serious) they are out of there
>warranty by
>500 miles. Some shops will do what is called a "good will" and cover
>it but
>that is rare. From my own personal exsperience (well my fathers at
>least)
>an EW was invaluable. So I would get an EW.
>
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:54 EDT