Re: About R/Ts

From: Scott Miller (kmiller@mail.cvn.net)
Date: Mon Oct 26 1998 - 23:49:12 EST


different strokes for different folks. this is what makes our world turn.
if everyone on this earth liked blue dakota's, lowered 4", and with a 4cyl.
this place would be very very very boring. we all need variety.

Now, personally I like a truck that is lowered about 2-4" from stock height.
I personally think it gives a truck an agressive look.

P.S. No flames from our 4 bangers, cause I had one too. Just some info to
chew on

Later

Scott Miller
Shelby Dakota #322
-----Original Message-----
From: Corey A Meyer <cameyer@bw.edu>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, October 26, 1998 6:17 PM
Subject: DML: About R/Ts

>
> I have a complaint. Now don't get me wrong, I am all for Dakota
>trucks, but in my opinion, if a truck isn't high with big tires, it just
>isn't completely a truck. I was excited when the 5.9L R/Ts came out.
>Butt my heart sank when I realized there was no 4x4 version. Now I feel
>that no matter how cool a truck is, if it can't be high with big tires,
>then it isn't worth getting.
> I feel the same way about lowering. How could anyone want to
>lower any truck, let alone the greatest of them all, our Dakotas. Now
>speed is one thing, but when you lower your truck down to the level of
>other less worthy trucks and even cars, I believe you have degraded your
>vehicle. No amount of speed is worth having a truck sitting on the
>ground-is it still a truck?
> This is how I feel and no one will ever change that but feel free
>to defend yourselves lowriders.
>
>Corey
>"The only good truck is one that could run over a new Beetle and not even
>realize it, the rest might as well be chebbies or even Nissans!"
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:47 EDT