----------
> From: Alan J. Thompson <vladimir@texas.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: RE: DML: RE:14" FIPK vs, Air Inlet Systems
> Date: Thursday, October 29, 1998 8:17 PM
>
> DITTO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Chris lang
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 1998 6:19 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE:14" FIPK vs, Air Inlet Systems
>
>
> I'd listen to jules on this one, he does know what he's talking about....
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dkota4by4@aol.com <Dkota4by4@aol.com>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Thursday, October 29, 1998 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: RE:14" FIPK vs, Air Inlet Systems
>
>
> >So let me get this right. The 14x3 that l have on my 318 now is going
to
> >perform better than the Quick D set up? I really don't want to pay $177
> for a
> >kit that is not going to do anything for me. Can someone please tell me
> >before l waste my $$
> >
> >In a message dated 98-10-29 16:06:14 EST, you write:
> >
> ><< dml-
> >
> > there is reason to further understand the real elements in this air
filter
> > issue. there are a number of units out there. k&n will provide cfm
> > ratings on all of their filters/systems if you call. the 14" unit is
> > around 700cfm. the magnum engine due to ve limits can't use that.
k&ns
> > new genll systems have some exciting cfm #s. the chev vortech 350
unit,
> > for example, offers 4" tube with 1100 cfm filter. furthermore... k&n
has
> > the r&d dept to fund research and their new parabloic aero chambers
> warrant
> > further lookie-see's... plus... the tubes are non-ferrous and exhibit
less
> > engine heat absorbtion...
> >
> > you can install the early dakota fipk on all v8 daks 96 up. add a
1/4X20
> > acorn nut anf it gets real pretty... :)
> >
> > imo... the 14" delivers the best power for the $... and that is over
all
> > current design cold air kits... mfg'd or home-built... or otherwise...
the
> > reason being that the short distance from the air filter to the tbi
> bore...
> > favors the needs of the engine's ve for that tune state... and residual
> cfm
> > losses from tube, duct etc... are non-existant....
> >
> > jam'n
> > >>
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:50 EDT