Re: [Fwd: 318/360]

From: William Blount Arthur (m990198@nadn.navy.mil)
Date: Wed Nov 04 1998 - 15:19:16 EST


Woefully underpowered??? Come on dude, no camaro, mustang or anything
else went much faster than that stock all through the '80s. Even the big
road runners and stuff were only like low 14's stock. Dont get me wrong,
I had rather have a classic mopar, but dont be all woefull. R/T's kick
butt. (almost as much as SS/T's !)

Bill
'97 SS/T

On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Alan Short wrote:

> To start with, the R/T wasn't offered with a v-10, I wish it had been,
> in fact that's what my gripe is, the R/T is woefully underpowered for
> something that's supposed to be fast. You're right about the 360 being a
> "truck" engine, once again my point, if a 318 is as fast and as reliable
> as a 360, why bother even produceing both of them. They are, after all,
> the same motor with different bore and stroke, amounting to little boost
> in hp or any thing else. Alan S.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:58 EDT