>in my opinion for the dakota's because there really isn't too much of a
>difference with the gas mileage from the 4cyl and the 6cyl. Well just my
>input...
>
Even though I used to have a 94 4-cylinder Dak before getting the R/T , I
too don't really understand the reasoning of the 4-banger .
I know that it may be fine for things like meter reading and delivery
trucks (if they don't deliver heavy loads) , but the mileage really isn't
that much different .
What I think is really dumb was making the 4-cylinder available in the CC
in 98 !!
It used to come standard with the 3.9 . I guess they wanted to make the CC
more affordable for the masses .
W . Jack Hilton III
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT