>From owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net Mon Nov 16 16:58:54 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by buffnet4.buffnet.net
(8.8.7/8.7.3) id TAA29515 for dakota-truck-outgoing; Mon, 16 Nov 1998
19:55:01 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id
TAA29500 for <dakota-truck>; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 19:54:58 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from buffnet5.buffnet.net(205.246.19.14) by
buffnet1.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
> id xma021719; Mon, 16 Nov 98 19:51:41 -0500
>Received: from webserv2.buffnet.net(205.247.125.2) by
buffnet5.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
> id xma029720; Mon, 16 Nov 98 19:50:31 -0500
>Received: from pollux.davidson.edu (pollux.davidson.edu [152.42.78.2])
> by webserv2.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA00452
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 19:53:10 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from rotrottmann@davidson.edu)
>Received: from ROTROTTMANN.davidson.edu (ROTROTTMANN.davidson.edu)
> by POLLUX.DAVIDSON.EDU (PMDF V5.0-6 #7389)
> id <01J494QWIKI88Z90ZG@POLLUX.DAVIDSON.EDU> for
dakota-truck@buffnet.net; Mon,
> 16 Nov 1998 19:51:56 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 19:53:47 -0600
>From: Robert Trottmann <rotrottmann@davidson.edu>
>Subject: Re: DML: Washshing the JETII
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Message-id: <3650D72A.E3966DC4@davidson.edu>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>References: <19981117000621.17139.qmail@hotmail.com>
>Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
>X-Mailing-List-Owner: stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
>X-URL: http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/DAKOTA/dakota.html
>X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
majordomo@buffnet.net.
>X-Unsubscribe-URL:
http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/WWW/CGI-BIN/dml.html
>
>Alan,
> Couldn't that cause problems w/ heat? Just a thought, I guess if
it
>works, it works.
>
>Leonard Zuniga wrote:
>
>> Alan
>>
>> I have had the same problem here recently with my Jet Chip. I
fabricated
>> a shroud of thick heavy plastic bag. I slit it up the sides about
half
>> way and feed back portion behind ecm and had enough to kind of wrap
>> sides together. Sealed sides with elec. tape and secured bottom with
>> large ty-wrap. So far so good.Not the prettiest but does the job.
>>
>> Later
>> Leonard
>> >FYI for those having trouble with wet JETII modules, when I bought
my
>> >R/T the salesman went over a few things before he let me drive away.
#1
>> >on the list was never use a car wash to clean under the hood, and if
>> you
>> >do, avoid the computer area all together.He went on to say that a
wet
>> >computer has left many stranded. I think they should have at least
>> >shrouded the thing with rubber splash guards or something. Anyway,
my
>> >mechanic cleans under the hood with simple green in a squirt bottle,
>> >rinse with a moderate hoseing and finish with compressed air. I have
>> >used a car wash , but avoided the computer and had no trouble. Alan
S.
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>
>--
>Mailto:rotrottmann@davidson.edu
>http://www.davidson.edu/personal/rotrottmann/default.htm
>Davidson, NC
>95 Sport 318 Auto 2WD
>ICQ 19665525
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT