RE: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: R/T times]]

From: Alan J. Thompson (vladimir@texas.net)
Date: Tue Nov 17 1998 - 21:41:39 EST


Alan,

>From one Alan to another, I say, the time slips might be a bit wrinkled is
certain places. One of these days, I will post my Indy's 11.3 time
slips(ie. stock with K&N and Computer...)

Thanks Alan

VLAD
96 Indy
"FASRAM" in the 11's uh-huh

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Alan Short
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 1:15 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: [Fwd: Re: DML: [Fwd: Re: R/T times]]

Bruce, that seems more like it to me. What's up with all the 14's? It's
really getting to me. I can't believe there's over a second and 5mph
difference in 2 basically stock R/T's, nor can I buy that the temp and
alt can make up THAT much difference. Anyone that has added parts to go
faster knows how tough even a 1/10th of a second is to come by, much
less, whole seconds and multi miles an hour. Consistent 15.2's is more
like a stock R/T time, at least as far as what I have. Alan S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:02 EDT