Re: RE: homemade RAM Air

From: Gordon Adams (rtgordon@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 28 1998 - 11:59:22 EST


that is exactly what i was talking about.
thanks

>From: "Gonzalez, Javier" <GonzalezJ@repind.com>
>To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: RE: homemade RAM Air
>Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 11:36:45 -0500
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>
>I also had the same realization. The factory setup makes no sense to
me. I
>used a PVC pipe (painted black), some hose clamps, and exchanged the
factory
>filter for a K&N drop-in. I noticed the difference under WOT (wide open
>throttle). This is probably the cheapest and most power efficient mod
that I
>have done upto date.
>
>
>Jav
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gordon Adams [mailto:rtgordon@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 28, 1998 11:17 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: homemade RAM Air
>
>
>I have a 99 R/T, and I was admiring the engine the other day when I
>noticed something about the factory air box configuration. Stock pulls
>air from within the engine. It looked to me like with a minor
>modification of the tube, you could point it to the front with an
>extension, and make it flush with the front of the engine compartment.
>The part that would have to be opened up is just a soft material. It
>even has a little x already puched through it in mine. It looks as
>though you could pipe air straight in to the factory box like this. Has
>any body else noticed this or attempted to do this. (of course you
>wouldnt do this with the factory air filter).
>
>gordon
>99 R/T black rc
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:32 EDT